Lomography Asks: Is It Acceptable to Photograph the Homeless?

11

The question "Is it acceptable to photograph the homeless?" is one of the most hotly-debated topics when it comes to street photography. There are two opposing sides to this: those who believe it is, and those who don't. For those who do, capturing such photographs is mere documentation of the world around us. For those who don't, doing so is a form of exploitation.

For the first installment of this new community opinion series, we turned to five Lomographers from various parts of the globe, all of them practicing street photography. They have each offered personal insights and based on their responses, ultimately, it can be safely deduced that it all boils down to the reason one has behind photographing the less fortunate members of society.

sirio174 from Italy

For Davide, a.k.a. @sirio174, the answer isn't black and white and is not fond of photographing them. He believes a professional such as a photojournalist fits the job more. He says:

“The answer isn't simple. This is my opinion. First of all, no. I don't like to photograph homeless and unlucky people. In fact, I have very few photos of these people. In these cases, I never show their face. See for example the photos here and here. These people need respect."

Credits: sirio174

Second, the same goes for the begging gypsies. These people have undergone many persecutions and deserve respect. So I took some photos of this woman, never showing her face. But this is different for gypsies who are street musicians. They work as street artists and showing their faces is not detrimental to their dignity. This is a public activity that delight the city streets with their music.

Now, a different opinion for professional services. If a journalist wanted to raise awareness on a social discomfort, I think he can take their portraits but on two conditions: (1) have the approval of the subject, and (2) have them pose in a way that highlights their dignity as men and woman. I see no need to take photos of faces of people in distress (for example: drunk or under the influence of drugs).”

robertofiuza from Portugal

It's all a matter of consideration, according to Roberto, a.k.a. @robertofiuza. Raising awareness through photography is one way photographing the homeless is acceptable. He shared:

“I think that if it is done right, it's acceptable to photograph homeless people. That being said, I've never shot a homeless person myself. Taking a picture of someone begging or sleeping on the street seems to me like taking advantage of someone's unfortunate situation to make an easy (and uninteresting) photograph. If you are doing a project or trying to raise awareness to a problem in your city, this kind of picture could be acceptable. Also, if you have a good picture in front of you (nice frame, good light, a cool interaction), the presence of a homeless person should not prevent you from taking the shot.”

Credits: robertofiuza

koduckgirl from the USA

Lomographer Pearl, who goes by @koduckgirl in the Community, also believes that people should be sensitive and empathic before tackling such issue in photography:

“This is definitely an interesting and delicate issue. I feel it's at par with whether one should photograph children that are not one's family, nudes that are sensual and artsy as opposed to sexual and pornographic, and shooting accidents as a goggle-eyed voyeur as opposed to a recorder of the tragic event.

I feel that when one photographs the homeless, one should be mindful of one's connection to their situation and how one can relate to it and how we are not above it. I don't generally photograph the homeless unless I can communicate with the person and ask permission and offer either a good conversation and/or offer money or buy their wares. When I don't do this it is mostly because the person is asleep or unaware that they happen to be in my shot and is part of recording a poignant situation or a larger scenario of city street life.

Credits: koduckgirl

I also don't generally photograph the homeless because I feel sensitive towards their situation and feel empathy and I can't solve the problem. I feel it is cruel to take snapshots like a tourist and walk away with my prize without even offering a better suggestion, as though to say _'I see you, I really see you, but see yah and now off I go to win the photo show at your expense.'_”

arguspaul from South Korea

Argus, a.k.a. @arguspaul believes that such an endeavor will only ever be truly appropriate is a personal relationship is established. He says:

“Context. I feel photography is all about context. People who find themselves homeless are just that: people. And if you're sticking your camera into someone else's suffering, I feel there's got to be a very good reason for it.

That being said, I feel it’s only truly appropriate if there’s a personal relationship between the photographer and the people they’re telling a story about (like Mary Ellen Mark), or if it’s a candid shot that could inspire understanding or social change. I rarely shoot the homeless, but on the occasions, I have felt the need to, it’s been to share a juxtaposition that critiques the urban landscape or passersby.”

adi_totp from Indonesia

Adi, a.k.a. @adi_totp thinks that photographers who are planning to photograph the homeless should first undertake serious self-reflection and question personal intentions:

“It is acceptable in my opinion. Why? I think it depends on us as a photographer/lomographer to shoot one or two homeless people on the streets. I mean, why do we shot them in the first place? To just take a photo of them? To document reality? To show that there are still homeless people on the streets? Or to just have fun shooting them?

In my opinion, we as photographers must ask ourselves: Why shoot the homeless? I like to think of myself as a documentary photographer who happens to be walking in the streets of one city. I document things that I see and what I feel. Maybe one day I'll shoot the homeless people in the streets of my city, Bandung. Why? To show people in Bandung that there are unlucky people out there and that we can't take things for granted anymore.

I take photos because I want to remember things. Maybe one photograph of the homeless people made me realize that we must help them and that we must be grateful for the things we have. It depends on us, really. Do you want to capture it for fun? For your own documentary of life in photographs?

Credits: adi_totp

We must realize that the reasons for shooting things will be asked by people eventually. Maybe one day, we will hold an exhibition and there's one portrait of the homeless then a visitor would ask you, '_Why did you shoot the homeless?'_ So you must be prepared with the answer! Is it for art? For the documenting? We must be aware of that and take responsibility.

I've been taking photos for years now and what I learned from the streets is that there's a certain etiquette in taking photos on the streets. Shoot and run? Yes, we can do that from time to time, but do we feel satisfied? Shoot one random stranger in the streets and then just go? Or must we ask for permission? There's a certain approach that requires interaction to the stranger on the streets. I usually talk to them first then ask, 'Can I shoot you? For my documentary, I'm not a photojournalist...'

At first, I was a bit nervous but as times went by, I became a bit confident to ask people on the streets. Maybe there are those who get annoyed because we shoot them randomly, and there are those who don't care about our presence. It really depends on us when hitting the streets. In the end, again, we must ask ourselves. Why do we shoot the homeless, anyway? I'll let you all think about that.”


How about you? Do you think it's acceptable to photograph the homeless? Why or why not? Keep the ball rolling by sharing your thoughts in the comments section below.

Lomography Asks is a new monthly series on the Lomography Magazine where we present a photography-related topic to the community aiming not to pit opposing views against one another, but to kick start an insightful and meaningful discussion among the community.

written by Julien Matabuena on 2015-09-25 #news #lomography-asks-series

11 Comments

  1. chooolss
    chooolss ·

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us @sirio174 @robertofiuza @koduckgirl @polka- @arguspaul @adi_totp!

  2. adi_totp
    adi_totp ·

    @chooolss you are welcome :D

  3. lorrainehealy
    lorrainehealy ·

    This confirms what I have always thought about [most] photographers: sensitive people who are willing to sit with hard questions and who value everyone's dignity. Thanks for this article

  4. chilledvondub
    chilledvondub ·

    I personally don't think it should classed unacceptable to photograph anyone regardless of their situation.

    As a community of film photographers we can all recognise that film is precious and we cherish what we capture, putting ourselves in the scenario of street photography shooting we're drawn towards that scene. I think it would be very profound to stumble upon a film photographer/lomographer that would document an image of this kind solely for exploitation, we leave that to the paparazzi.

    I haven't photographed homeless people myself however I have delved into candid street photography with public interactions and the occasional lost soul. I find myself quite apprehensive when it comes to approaching strangers and the uncertainty of their reaction in day to day life. In my experience a lot of people reactive well to having their photo taken and if you can connect with that person offer them a gift or a compliment there's a mutual fulfillment of pride.

    There will never be a definitive answer to weather it should be acceptable or not, it's up to the photographer to justify the capture.

    Great article :)

  5. lomaugustry
    lomaugustry ·

    I have no problem with it I often ask before I take a picture though but not when they are unable to respond like in this case. It's a documentation of daily life nothing more unless used in a way that makes them seem like objects for observation and not the people they are. www.lomography.com/homes/lomaugustry/films/871962420-fpp-ed…

  6. chooolss
    chooolss ·

    Here's another insight from @adamo-75, one of our respondents. Thank you!:

    Yes (sometimes). I think the issue comes down to intent and the question, "Why am I taking this photo?" Other questions such as "What am I going to do with this photo? Am I going to post or display it?" are also worth asking. It needs to be considered whether taking the shot is treating the person with dignity and respect or is it being taken for selfish reasons (eg. an easy target) as there is a danger of being exploitative. In some ways photographing homeless people is different to other street photography as in some sense you are entering their territory/home by taking the photo, so I believe it is more respectful to ask permission before shooting, maybe have a conversation and find out a bit about their story if appropriate. If done with a clear intent, photos of homeless people can have the potential to raise awareness of the issues facing the disadvantaged and give these people a voice.

    And thank you as well for sharing your opinions @lorrainehealy @chilledvondub @lomaugustry!

  7. lmgcanada
    lmgcanada ·

    Dignity and compassion are words that are the prerequisites of being a photographer regardless of the medium. Firstly I always ask permission after expressing an interest in how the person is doing. My humble gift to the homeless person is to provide a $5.00 bill to buy a coffee and a bite to eat. Allowing a homeless person the dignity of going into a coffee shop to pay for there own coffee pays forward allowing the person to be exactly that and much more cooperative and often with a story.

  8. blende64
    blende64 ·

    In my opinion as long as the dignity of the person is respected and they have been asked it should be ok
    If the individual is not recocnisable should be ok too
    And for sure the aim of the Photo should be respectable and serious
    There is an Interessengruppen Book named Faces it is about homeless in the City of Berlin very Impressing
    My aunt is a homeless Person in Berlin but we Canon help her due to her Heavy Alkoholism there is no hope that she gets the power to begin to help herself

  9. blende64
    blende64 ·

    Some corrections (these autocorrection with smartphone is terrible):
    I meant: interesting book named"Faces" it is in german language
    We cannot help my aunt because she is so deep in alcoholism that there is no hope for us she will apply the power to start helping herself

  10. ladislav
    ladislav ·

    Hello Julien

    I think you are absolutely right
    On of the most moving picture I've ever seen was a electric chair from Andy Warhol
    Why I am saying this, it was the most unexpected thing to see at the exhibition
    Is the homeless person the most unexpected person to see on the street? If yes take a picture
    But don't choose this subject while you are in them "living room" with no permission at all
    This may/will upset the most who enjoys photography
    Regards

  11. akula
    akula ·

    Becoming a tourist of poverty... Is it acceptable for me to take pictures of you in your home without permission? The street is home to the homeless. But most of all, what do I have to add to this discourse?

More Interesting Articles